Author summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Ravani results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 547 hits . Analysis detected 3,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,526 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (861 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Ravani is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Sarah Ravani
Author details
Total words: 2,526
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.0% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 21.6% 21.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 21.6% 21.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.8% 9.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.9% 14.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Author 21.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 21.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.9%, sitewide 8.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Composition/Division: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst