Author summary
72% 1 analyzed article/video 549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah K. Burris results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 364 hits . Analysis detected 1,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,647 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,279 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah K. Burris is worse (more manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Sarah K. Burris
Author details
Total words: 1,647
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.7% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.1% 22.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 5.5% 5.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.7% 4.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 22.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst