Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Mcgiff results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.1% saturation with 999 hits . Analysis detected 4,734 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 85% (1,005 of 6,387 authors). This Sara Mcgiff is worse (more manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Sara Mcgiff
Author details
Total words: 3,216
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.3% percentile 5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.9% 18.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 31.1% 31.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 31.1%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.1%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.4%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 7.2%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst