Author summary
⁠18%1 analyzed article/video316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These sara Gharaibeh results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 451 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (4,641 of 6,628 authors). This sara Gharaibeh is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
sara Gharaibeh
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠30%sara Gharaibeh (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,264
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos

U.S.⁠15%
The Japan Times⁠67%By Arsalan Shahla⁠58% sara Gharaibeh⁠18%7/12/2026, 4:17:00 PM