Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,829 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sangar Khaleel results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,046 hits . Analysis detected 6,422 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,992 of 6,628 authors). This Sangar Khaleel is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group. Sangar Khaleel
Author details
Total words: 7,316
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.3% 14.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst