Author summary
1%2 analyzed articles/videos4,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Levine results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 4,449 hits. Analysis detected 17,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,930 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,686 of 6,207 authors). This Sam Levine is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Sam Levine
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
57%Sam Levine (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,930
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.4%16.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 29.8%29.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 29.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos