Author summary
87% 2 analyzed articles/videos 113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Karlin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 334 hits . Analysis detected 3,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,621 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,962 of 6,628 authors). This Sam Karlin is worse (more manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group. Sam Karlin
Author details
Total words: 3,621
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.3% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.8% 8.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst