Author summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sally Satel results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 923 hits. Analysis detected 7,953 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,312 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (4,717 of 6,363 authors). This Sally Satel is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Sally Satel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠26%Sally Satel (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,312
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510025.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.9%8.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos