Author summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These S. E. Cupp results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 638 hits . Analysis detected 3,491 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,109 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (922 of 6,356 authors). This S. E. Cupp is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. S. E. Cupp
Author details
Total words: 2,109
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.5% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 22.7% 22.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 20.1% 20.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.3% 30.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 30.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Author 22.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 20.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.9%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst