Author summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Lloyd results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ā 94% (377 of 6,292 authors). This Robert Lloyd is worse (more manipulative) than 94.00% of the peer group.
Robert Lloyd
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Sneha Dey1%
ā 0%Ideastream Public Media1%
ā 0%Megan Fan Munce1%
ā 1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 94%Robert Lloyd (selected)10%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 304
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510094.0% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles304 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0ā€“25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 20.1%20.1%Attempt to Sell a Productā€¦Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Author 20.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos