Author summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Roeper results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 292 hits . Analysis detected 1,459 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,350 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 86% (969 of 6,519 authors). This Richard Roeper is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Richard Roeper
Author details
Total words: 1,350
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.1% percentile 5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 21.6% 21.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.8% 13.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.4% 20.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.4%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 21.6%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst