Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 478 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Pollina results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 290 hits . Analysis detected 1,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,913 of 6,358 authors). This Richard Pollina is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Richard Pollina
Author details
Total words: 1,912
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.2% 15.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.6% 2.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst