Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Richard Elliot results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 217 faulty-reasoning hits from 658 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Richard Elliot is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Richard Elliot
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Richard Elliot (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 658
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles658 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.0%5.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 6.7%6.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos