Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard D. Kahlenberg results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 5,200 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,452 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 68% (2,159 of 6,628 authors). This Richard D. Kahlenberg is worse (more manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group.
Richard D. Kahlenberg
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
68%Richard D. Kahlenberg (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,452
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510067.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos