Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard A. Webster results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,609 of 6,628 authors). This Richard A. Webster is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Richard A. Webster
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
31%Richard A. Webster (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,768
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510030.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos