Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebecca Crowe results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 319 hits. Analysis detected 3,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,320 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (6,282 of 6,628 authors). This Rebecca Crowe is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
Rebecca Crowe
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠6%Rebecca Crowe (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,320
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

5% percentile
02550751005.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos