Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,926 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rafael Nam results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 2,786 hits . Analysis detected 19,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,810 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (4,086 of 6,497 authors). This Rafael Nam is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Rafael Nam
Author details
Total words: 18,810
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.8% 14.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst