Author summary
57% 1 analyzed article/video 745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Kane results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 537 hits . Analysis detected 4,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,536 of 6,363 authors). This Rachel Kane is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group. Rachel Kane
Author details
Total words: 2,980
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.9% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.0% 18.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 12.3% 12.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.5% 8.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.7% 14.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.7%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 12.3%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst