Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video826 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Kornbluh results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29% saturation with 959 hits. Analysis detected 5,494 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,304 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,035 of 6,350 authors). This Peter Kornbluh is worse (more manipulative) than 83.70% of the peer group.
Peter Kornbluh
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
84%Peter Kornbluh (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,304
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510083.7% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 29.0%29.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.2%9.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 8.9%8.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 27.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos