Author summary
44% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Hancock results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 415 hits . Analysis detected 4,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,622 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (4,139 of 6,169 authors). This Peter Hancock is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Peter Hancock
Author details
Total words: 6,622
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst