Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Beaumont results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 714 hits . Analysis detected 4,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,962 of 6,508 authors). This Peter Beaumont is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. Peter Beaumont
Author details
Total words: 3,560
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.1% 20.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 6.5% 6.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 16.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 14.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Horn Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst