Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Rogers results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 738 hits . Analysis detected 4,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,576 of 6,315 authors). This Paul Rogers is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Paul Rogers
Author details
Total words: 4,288
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 9.0%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst