Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Paul Birch results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 726 hits . Analysis detected 3,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,037 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,296 authors). This Paul Birch is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Paul Birch
Author details
Total words: 2,037
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 35.6% 35.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.4% 9.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.4% 17.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 35.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 9.4%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst