Author summary
100%1 analyzed article/video803 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Butler results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 774 hits. Analysis detected 5,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,409 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of 92% (552 of 6,498 authors). This Patrick Butler is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Patrick Butler
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
92%Patrick Butler (selected)8%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,409
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

92% percentile
025507510091.5% percentile
7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 29.1%29.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 31.4%31.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 32.1%32.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 16.4%16.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.3%6.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.8%5.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 32.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 31.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 29.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 16.4%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 14.9%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 12.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos