Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patricia Babcock McGraw results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 603 hits . Analysis detected 4,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (2,071 of 6,628 authors). This Patricia Babcock McGraw is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Patricia Babcock McGraw
Author details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 16.2% 16.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.9% 19.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.2% 5.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst