Author summary
31% 1 analyzed article/video 888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Olivia Marble results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 220 hits . Analysis detected 1,425 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,664 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,265 of 6,628 authors). This Olivia Marble is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group. Olivia Marble
Author details
Total words: 2,664
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst