Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oliver Holmes results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 435 hits . Analysis detected 2,066 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,290 of 6,628 authors). This Oliver Holmes is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Oliver Holmes
Author details
Total words: 2,400
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst