Author summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video1,105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nstarobin results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 425 hits. Analysis detected 3,237 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,315 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (2,158 of 6,358 authors). This Nstarobin is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Nstarobin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠67%Nstarobin (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,315
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.5%8.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos