Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,043 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nora McKee results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 4,144 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,168 of 6,359 authors). This Nora McKee is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Nora McKee
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
51%Nora McKee (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,172
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.8%1.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos