Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Secades results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 106 hits . Analysis detected 744 faulty-reasoning hits from 700 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 90% (697 of 6,628 authors). This Noah Secades is worse (more manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group. Noah Secades
Author details
Total words: 700
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.5% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles700 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 14.4% 14.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.1% 15.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 9.7% 9.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.9% 8.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 15.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 14.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 9.7%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst