Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,345 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nikki Overfelt Chifalu results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 366 hits . Analysis detected 2,950 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,470 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,293 of 6,628 authors). This Nikki Overfelt Chifalu is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Nikki Overfelt Chifalu
Author details
Total words: 4,470
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst