Author summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 1,177 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole Carpenter results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 484 hits . Analysis detected 3,132 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,887 of 6,263 authors). This Nicole Carpenter is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group. Nicole Carpenter
Author details
Total words: 4,708
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst