Author summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 541 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NICOLAS GARRIGA Associated Press results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 185 hits . Analysis detected 1,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,623 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,764 of 6,172 authors). This NICOLAS GARRIGA Associated Press is worse (more manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group. NICOLAS GARRIGA Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 1,623
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.2% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.0%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst