Author summary
54%1 analyzed article/video399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nico Savidge results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 308 hits. Analysis detected 1,496 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,111 of 6,316 authors). This Nico Savidge is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Nico Savidge
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
83%Nico Savidge (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,596
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510082.4% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 19.3%19.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 15.7%15.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 8.3%8.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Author 19.3%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 15.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos