Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Spicer results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.8% saturation with 373 hits . Analysis detected 2,537 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (776 of 6,628 authors). This Nick Spicer is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Nick Spicer
Author details
Total words: 1,448
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.3% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.8% 25.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 19.9% 19.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 20.6% 20.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 21.0% 21.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.8% 14.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 21.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.8%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 20.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias: Author 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst