Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Schifrin results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 771 hits . Analysis detected 7,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,582 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.7% and a BS Rank of 87% (904 of 6,628 authors). This Nick Schifrin is worse (more manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group. Nick Schifrin
Author details
Total words: 3,582
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.4% percentile 5.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 21.5% 21.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 15.7% 15.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.8% 15.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.5% 20.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.9% 15.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.2% 4.2% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.5%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 21.5%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.8%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 15.7%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.6%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst