Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nick Craven results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 747 hits. Analysis detected 4,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,365 authors). This Nick Craven is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nick Craven
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Nick Craven (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 4,536
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.2%13.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.5%0.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Genetic Fallacy: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate