Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,059 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Mosvick results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 293 hits . Analysis detected 2,469 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of â 21% (5,299 of 6,628 authors). This Nicholas Mosvick is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Nicholas Mosvick
Author details
Total words: 4,236
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst