Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,204 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nesrine Malik results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 3,065 hits . Analysis detected 12,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,699 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 72% (1,745 of 6,135 authors). This Nesrine Malik is worse (more manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group. Nesrine Malik
Author details
Total words: 7,699
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.6% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 39.8% 39.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.6% 8.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.6%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Horn Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst