Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 891 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nazrin Nahar results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 844 hits . Analysis detected 5,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,481 of 6,603 authors). This Nazrin Nahar is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group. Nazrin Nahar
Author details
Total words: 3,564
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
78% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.6% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.7% 23.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.8% 13.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.5% 4.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.6% 5.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst