Author summary
49%1 analyzed article/video2,987 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Akehurst results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 906 hits. Analysis detected 6,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,961 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,379 of 6,234 authors). This Nathan Akehurst is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.
Nathan Akehurst
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
30%Nathan Akehurst (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,961
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

30% percentile
025507510029.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.1%10.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos