Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Natallie Rocha results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Slippery Slope , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 2,122 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,622 authors). This Natallie Rocha is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Natallie Rocha
Author details
Total words: 3,728
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Red Herring: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.7% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst