Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morgan Marietta results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 700 hits . Analysis detected 6,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,752 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,757 of 6,628 authors). This Morgan Marietta is better (less manipulative) than 86.90% of the peer group. Morgan Marietta
Author details
Total words: 9,752
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst