Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,591 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morgan Chilson results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 2,013 hits. Analysis detected 11,714 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,972 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,321 of 6,244 authors). This Morgan Chilson is worse (more manipulative) than 62.80% of the peer group.
Morgan Chilson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
63%Morgan Chilson (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,972
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

63% percentile
025507510062.8% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.6%12.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 6.9%6.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 22.4%22.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.7%11.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 22.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%Slippery Slope: Author 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate