Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Molly Hennessy-Fiske results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 570 faulty-reasoning hits from 400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠94% (388 of 6,366 authors). This Molly Hennessy-Fiske is worse (more manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group.
Molly Hennessy-Fiske
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠94%Molly Hennessy-Fiske (selected)10%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 400
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

94% percentile
025507510093.9% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles400 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 34.5%34.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.0%14.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.0%14.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.8%3.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 11.3%11.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 14.0%14.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 34.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 11.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos