Author summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 938 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miriam Cates results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Anecdotal , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 895 hits . Analysis detected 5,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,814 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (677 of 6,603 authors). This Miriam Cates is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Miriam Cates
Author details
Total words: 2,814
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.8% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 31.8% 31.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 27.8% 27.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 23.6% 23.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Author 31.8%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 27.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 23.6%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Author 18.0%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.5%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.4%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst