Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mir Umar results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 717 hits . Analysis detected 5,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (4,155 of 6,628 authors). This Mir Umar is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group. Mir Umar
Author details
Total words: 7,712
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst