Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mimi Rocah results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 1,238 hits . Analysis detected 5,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,733 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ā 92% (532 of 6,359 authors). This Mimi Rocah is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Mimi Rocah
Author details
Total words: 2,733
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.6% percentile 7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 45.3% 45.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 23.0% 23.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 17.4% 17.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.8% 12.8% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Author 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 23.1% 23.1% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 7.5% 7.5% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 12.0% 12.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.6% 7.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 45.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 23.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 23.0%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 17.4%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 10.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.0% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Tu Quoque: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst