Author summary
49%1 analyzed article/video2,412 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miles MacClure results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 5,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (6,530 of 7,495 authors). This Miles MacClure is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group.
Miles MacClure
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Cleveland Documenters1%
0%T. Christian Miller1%
0%Ken Armstrong1%
1%Brenna Ehrlich1%
13%Miles MacClure (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,648
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510012.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos