Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Tsichlis results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 486 hits . Analysis detected 4,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ā 41% (3,970 of 6,628 authors). This Mike Tsichlis is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group. Mike Tsichlis
Author details
Total words: 5,292
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Politically Right Leaning⦠Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst