Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,323 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Tsichlis results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 486 hits. Analysis detected 4,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (3,970 of 6,628 authors). This Mike Tsichlis is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Mike Tsichlis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠41%Mike Tsichlis (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,292
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.1%5.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.6%1.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos